HOME WSM PRODUCT INFO COOKING TOPICS OPERATING TIPS & MODS VIDEOS RESOURCES FORUMS SHOPPING
The Virtual Weber Bullet  
The Virtual Weber Bullet    The Virtual Weber Bulletin Board  Hop To Forum Categories  Polls    Lump or briquettes?
Page 1 2 3 4 5 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
TVWBB Super Fan
Posted Hide Post
gary, i love the flavor of the comp briqs, but imho they burn too quickly for overnighters so i can see how you'd run up the expense. i use them for grilling or doing a turkey. the blue bag kingsford gives me 12-14 hours burns, using a minion start and no off flavors (i taste coffee for a living so i can taste pretty well). i just use a foiled water pan, no water. the butts come out perfect every time; give it a try. especially now that it's getting cold up there i think that using water in your pan is just too much of a heat sink and you'll burn even more fuel.
 
Posts: 419 | Location: NJ | Registered: March 29, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Wizard
Posted Hide Post
Switched to and learned to use lump years ago and never going back. Smells better tastes better burns better IMHO. Often don't even use smokewood, the lump can provide decent smoke flavor on many occaisions.


Ray
WSM*Weber Performer
 
Posts: 1692 | Location: Southeastern PA | Registered: October 02, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Member
Picture of Gary H. NJ
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sean S.:
gary, i love the flavor of the comp briqs, but imho they burn too quickly for overnighters so i can see how you'd run up the expense. i use them for grilling or doing a turkey. the blue bag kingsford gives me 12-14 hours burns, using a minion start and no off flavors (i taste coffee for a living so i can taste pretty well). i just use a foiled water pan, no water. the butts come out perfect every time; give it a try. especially now that it's getting cold up there i think that using water in your pan is just too much of a heat sink and you'll burn even more fuel.

And the foiled water pan is to... collect fat/drippings so there's no flair-ups? If that's the case, can't I just forget the pan altogether? The old-timers seem to do whole hog that way purposely so the smoke of the burned fat adds flavor. Or am I completely off the mark?
I will, however, try water-free soon, and thanks for the tips.
Cheers.


22.5 WSM, 18.5 OTG
 
Posts: 48 | Location: West Milford, NJ, USA | Registered: October 19, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Super Fan
Posted Hide Post
the pan collects the drippings, which char and certainly add some small amount of fatty smoky goodness of their own, i'm sure, and do stop the flare ups, which could be pretty massive i'd reckon given the amount of fat that drips out. the pan stops that. this also stops all the resultant ash that would billow up and coat your butts. the pan also serves as a mild heat sink and more importantly i believe somewhat of a heat disperser so there aren't hot spots on the butts above that cause uneven cooking.
 
Posts: 419 | Location: NJ | Registered: March 29, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Member
Picture of Gary H. NJ
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sean S.:
the pan collects the drippings, which char and certainly add some small amount of fatty smoky goodness of their own, i'm sure, and do stop the flare ups, which could be pretty massive i'd reckon given the amount of fat that drips out. the pan stops that. this also stops all the resultant ash that would billow up and coat your butts. the pan also serves as a mild heat sink and more importantly i believe somewhat of a heat disperser so there aren't hot spots on the butts above that cause uneven cooking.

Thanks, Sean. I really appreciate the input.
Best,
Gary


22.5 WSM, 18.5 OTG
 
Posts: 48 | Location: West Milford, NJ, USA | Registered: October 19, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Super Fan
Posted Hide Post
good luck and let me know how it turns out!
 
Posts: 419 | Location: NJ | Registered: March 29, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Member
Posted Hide Post
I've tried lump and thought it was fun to use but i like the price of briquettes and the even burn. plus half of the lump dumps through the bottom of the chimney. thats me though.
Leif


"I quit smoking ciggarettes and started smoking food."
 
Posts: 36 | Location: milwaukee,WI | Registered: October 13, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
New Member
Posted Hide Post
Lump mesquite preferred, or Cowboy Hardwood Charcoal at Home Depot.


Sacramento Outdoor Cooking Examiner

Weber Performer
Cookshack Smokette
Pitts and Spitts offset
Weber Genesis
 
Posts: 6 | Location: Sacramento, CA | Registered: November 11, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2 3 4 5  
 

The Virtual Weber Bullet    The Virtual Weber Bulletin Board  Hop To Forum Categories  Polls    Lump or briquettes?

© 1997-2009 Chris A. Allingham LLC
The Virtual Weber Bullet is an unofficial Weber product fan site and is not affiliated with the Weber-Stephen Products Co.