HOME WSM PRODUCT INFO COOKING TOPICS OPERATING TIPS & MODS VIDEOS RESOURCES FORUMS SHOPPING
The Virtual Weber Bullet  
Celebrating 10 Years Online! ~ 1998-2008
The Virtual Weber Bullet    The Virtual Weber Bulletin Board  Hop To Forum Categories  Polls    Water, sand, empty pan, or no pan at all?
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
TVWBB Pro
Picture of Russell Y
Posted Hide Post
Beginning - water in the pan, standard operating procedure.

Middle - sand in the pan, easier clean up.

End - foil in the pan. Guru owner.


Russell
If you're not on somebody's *hit list, you're not doing anything worthwhile
 
Posts: 572 | Location: Whittier, California | Registered: July 23, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Pro
Picture of Rick Soliman
Posted Hide Post
I have never tried without the pan maybe this week.


The Smoke Hunters BBQ Team

 
Posts: 693 | Location: Minooka, IL | Registered: May 03, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Member
Picture of Victor De
Posted Hide Post
Right now I am using the WSM water pan. Will be upgrading to the Brinkman pan in the near future. Sand may be easier but I like the water and the false idea that water may be keeping the meat moister.

Vic


Smoke but don't inhale!
 
Posts: 88 | Location: Pitman, New Jersey | Registered: July 12, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Picture of Greg Kemp
Posted Hide Post
I use foil covered pan with water in WSM. Victor I'm with you on the mirage of moisture feeling you get with water in the pan. It does have psychological benefits!

aloha!

greg kemp
 
Posts: 204 | Location: Kailua, HAWAII | Registered: March 13, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Picture of Dan Gilson
Posted Hide Post
I use an empty clay flower pot base covered with foil for easy cleanup.

Enjoy,
Dan
3DB


Enjoy,
Dan
3 Dogs BBQ

WSM x 2
One-Touch Silver x 1
Stoker x 1
 
Posts: 123 | Location: North Pole, Alaska | Registered: June 07, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Member
Picture of Michael Stella
Posted Hide Post
I use a foil lined water pan. For overnight smokes I use a foil lined Brinkman water pan.

Michael
 
Posts: 81 | Location: Central, Ohio | Registered: September 06, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Picture of Jim Groom
Posted Hide Post
Is there any way to restart this topic and update the questions to include more options, such as the clay pot base, and the piedmont pan?

Things seem to have evolved since March of 2005.


No is just a slow yes.
AKA HeSmellsLikeSmoke

WSM "DI"
WSM "L" Rescued and living nearby with my son
Weber Performer Stainless "EE"
Brinkmann SnP Pro
 
Posts: 204 | Location: Warren, Vermont | Registered: May 08, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Super Fan
Posted Hide Post
Jim, I bet your using the Piedmont Pan in conjunction with the foiled terra cotta saucer. Thats all I use now, easy temps and clean up is just a folding of the foil.
 
Posts: 335 | Location: Charleston,SC | Registered: January 08, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Moderator
TVWBB Hall of Fame
Picture of Chris Allingham
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jim Groom:
Is there any way to restart this topic and update the questions to include more options, such as the clay pot base, and the piedmont pan?

Things seem to have evolved since March of 2005.
I certainly could restart this poll, but my guess is that there would be very few people selecting clay pot or piedmont pan, and in order to get those couple of votes registered I'd lose 2 years worth of data. I'm not sure it's worth it.

Maybe a better choice would be to start a poll on alternatives to normal water pans. Still, I'm not sure that's of broad interest.

Regards,
Chris
 
Posts: 5291 | Location: San Jose, CA | Registered: November 10, 1999Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Picture of Jim Groom
Posted Hide Post
Dino, my WSM is brand new and I have only used the stock water pan so far. I am trying to decide if I want to make a mod, and if so, what one.

This poll is very helpful to me for making that decision.

Chris, thanks for your answer. I can see and agree with your point.

I was looking at the subject more from a newbie viewpoint. It is very easy to try the different options myself with very little expense to see what one I like, so that is what I will do.


No is just a slow yes.
AKA HeSmellsLikeSmoke

WSM "DI"
WSM "L" Rescued and living nearby with my son
Weber Performer Stainless "EE"
Brinkmann SnP Pro
 
Posts: 204 | Location: Warren, Vermont | Registered: May 08, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Pro
Picture of Tom Ferguson
Posted Hide Post
I use the Brinkmann pan the most, when I'm using water. I tried sand in the WSM pan, but it just didn't work for me as well, and the heat wasn't as easy to control. I'll never use sand again.

But the WSM is such a versatile cooker, that I also use it without a pan at all. This is best for cooking chicken at higher temps. Let the chicken drippings fall on the coals and bring more flavor to the cooker chamber.

Move the charcoal pan up to the bottom grate and the WSM becomes the perfect Grill.

Can't beat the WSM!


----------------------------
WSM, Weber Genesis Gas Grill, Weber Platinum, Weber Q, Gator Pit Mobile Party Gator, CookShack Smokette 009
 
Posts: 829 | Location: Cumberland Plateau | Registered: November 03, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Member
Picture of T.J. Balcerak
Posted Hide Post
Thus far I've only used the stock WSM water pan filled with either water or apple juice, or a mixture of both. But yesterday I smoked a bunch of wings, and used the stock pan without water, lined with foil. I was shooting for higher temps with the wings, so I felt liquid was unnecessary, and it indeed was. For a short cook like that, I'm fine with no water, but on longer cooks, I like having the temp-regulating water/juice in there for moisture and temp control. But I've been using up the rest of my Kingsford to try out lump, maybe lump will benefit more from sand in the pan or clay pot base... I have much experimentation and learning to do!


Smoked Up!
 
Posts: 53 | Location: Maryland | Registered: May 07, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Member
Posted Hide Post
It seems like the obvious question to ask.
What is the advantage of an empty pan versus no pan at all? Heat distribution?


WSM 2007
22.5 Weber Gold
Jen Aire 50,000 BTUs
 
Posts: 35 | Location: Bonita Springs, FL | Registered: June 05, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Honor Circle
Picture of Doug D
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bruce R:
It seems like the obvious question to ask.
What is the advantage of an empty pan versus no pan at all? Heat distribution?

More heat deflection, actually. Maintaining the indirectness of heat, which is widely considered a fundamental of true BBQ.


--
Coquo, ergo sum.
 
Posts: 4761 | Location: New Orleans | Registered: November 17, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Gold Member
Picture of Steve Petrone
Posted Hide Post
Some in NC may disagree from what I have read. There would appear to be a significant group of BBQ's who treasure direct cook with the fat flavoring the fire.

For most of us, indirect cooking is more predictable and easier.


Peach Kissed Q
 
Posts: 2315 | Location: Charlotte, NC | Registered: January 05, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Member
Posted Hide Post
Thank you. This does make sense.


WSM 2007
22.5 Weber Gold
Jen Aire 50,000 BTUs
 
Posts: 35 | Location: Bonita Springs, FL | Registered: June 05, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Member
Picture of Danny Parker
Posted Hide Post
Did my first WSM cook last night with sand in the pan and had no problem at all. Did 2 butts and man was the clean up easy.


Born to cook

Born to ride
 
Posts: 61 | Location: Winnfield LA | Registered: June 18, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Posted Hide Post
low and slow for ribs and brisket water in the pan the wsm came with. takes me no time at all to clean it. foiling the thing seemed to be far more difficult for me that just soaking it for a few minutes then wiping it out with a scrubby.

for high heat chicken standard pan no lining nothing in it.

who is crazy to use no pan at all??
 
Posts: 147 | Registered: June 04, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Picture of Scott T (Odirom)
Posted Hide Post
Guru---empty pan. I use about HALF of the fuel I used to.


Scott T. (Odirom)
WSM, BBQ Guru DigiQII <-- MUST HAVE!, Weber Smokey Joe Silver, New Braunfels
 
Posts: 151 | Location: Indianapolis, IN | Registered: June 27, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TVWBB Fan
Picture of Paul Balzotti
Posted Hide Post
DigiQ II = NO Water.


I gotta rumblin in my tumblin for BBQ Pig.
 
Posts: 175 | Location: New Hampshire | Registered: May 21, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2  
 

The Virtual Weber Bullet    The Virtual Weber Bulletin Board  Hop To Forum Categories  Polls    Water, sand, empty pan, or no pan at all?

© 1997-2008 Chris A. Allingham LLC
The Virtual Weber Bullet is an unofficial Weber product fan site and is not affiliated with the Weber-Stephen Products Co.